Search for: All records

We consider the zero-energy deformations of periodic origami sheets with generic crease patterns. Using a mapping from the linear folding motions of such sheets to force-bearing modes in conjunction with the Maxwell–Calladine index theorem we derive a relation between the number of linear folding motions and the number of rigid body modes that depends only on the average coordination number of the origami’s vertices. This supports the recent result by Tachi [T. Tachi,Origami6, 97–108 (2015)] which shows periodic origami sheets with triangular faces exhibit two-dimensional spaces of rigidly foldable cylindrical configurations. We also find, through analytical calculation and numerical simulation, branching of this configuration space from the flat state due to geometric compatibility constraints that prohibit finite Gaussian curvature. The same counting argument leads to pairing of spatially varying modes at opposite wavenumber in triangulated origami, preventing topological polarization but permitting a family of zero-energy deformations in the bulk that may be used to reconfigure the origami sheet.

 

Modern fabrication tools have now provided a number of platforms for designing flat sheets that, by virtue of their nonuniform growth, can buckle and fold into target three-dimensional structures. Theoretically, there is an infinitude of growth patterns that can produce the same shape, yet almost nothing is understood about which of these many growth patterns is optimal from the point of view of experiment, and few can even be realized at all. Here, we ask the question: what is the optimal way to design isotropic growth patterns for a given target shape? We propose a computational algorithm to produce optimal growth patterns by introducing cuts into the target surfaces. Within this framework, we propose that the patterns requiring the fewest or shortest cuts produce the best approximations to the target shape at finite thickness. The results are tested by simulation on spherical surfaces, and new challenges are highlighted for surfaces with both positive and negative Gaussian curvatures.